Before this change, `brew bottle` would add the `:arm64_linux` bottle
lines last. This would make `brew style` complain because it wants the
`arm64_*` bottles listed first.
Let's fix this by retaining the existing style as closely as possible:
- macOS bottles are listed first
- for each OS, arm64 bottles are listed first (just as we do on macOS)
In particular, `brew bottle` will now insert `:arm64_linux` bottle lines
just above the `:x86_64_linux` bottle lines (but still below the macOS
bottle lines).
x86_64 may continue to be a more popular platform on Linux for quite
some time. However, users looking for those bottles can continue to look
in the same place as before this change (i.e., the last line of the
bottle block). Taking this together with the consistency on macOS
mentioned above, I think this is the right way forward here.
For concreteness, here are some examples of bottle blocks before and after
this change.
Before this change, immediately after `brew bottle`:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
end
Before this change, after doing `brew style --fix`:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
end
After this change:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
end
- I considered writing a cop for this, but it's not worth it:
there are no `[:test, :build]` occurrences in Core and this
Rust rule only applies in Core formulae.
- Some of these I bumped to `typed: strict`, some of them I added
intermediary type signatures to some of the methods to make my life
easier in the (near, hopefully) future.
- Turns out that RuboCop node matchers that end in `?`
can return `nil` if they don't match anything, not `false`.
- These can be either BlockNode, SendNode or AsgnNode,
which are all a type of Node.
- This causes errors in other places because we call
BlockNode or SendNode methods on a Node now. Still TODO.
Formulae, casks, and resources have a `#livecheckable?` method that
indicates whether they contain a `livecheck` block. This is intended
to be read as "has a livecheckable?", not "is livecheckable?" (as
livecheck can find versions for some packages/resources without a
`livecheck` block). Unfortunately, correct understanding of this
method's behavior [outside of documentation] relies on historical
knowledge that few people possess, so this is often confusing to
anyone who hasn't been working on livecheck since 2020.
In the olden days, a "livecheckable" was a Ruby file containing a
`livecheck` block (originally a hash) with a filename that
corresponded to a related formula. The `livecheck` blocks in
livecheckable files were integrated into their respective formulae in
August 2020, so [first-party] livecheckables ceased to exist at that
time. From that point forward, we simply referred to these as
`livecheck` blocks.
With that in mind, this clarifies the situation by replacing
"livecheckable" language. This includes renaming `#livecheckable?` to
`#livecheck_defined?`, replacing usage of "livecheckable" as a noun
with "`livecheck` block", replacing "livecheckable" as a boolean with
"livecheck_defined", and replacing incorrect usage of "livecheckable"
as an adjective with "checkable".
- Previously I thought that comments were fine to discourage people from
wasting their time trying to bump things that used `undef` that Sorbet
didn't support. But RuboCop is better at this since it'll complain if
the comments are unnecessary.
- Suggested in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/18018#issuecomment-2283369501.
- I've gone for a mixture of `rubocop:disable` for the files that can't
be `typed: strict` (use of undef, required before everything else, etc)
and `rubocop:todo` for everything else that should be tried to make
strictly typed. There's no functional difference between the two as
`rubocop:todo` is `rubocop:disable` with a different name.
- And I entirely disabled the cop for the docs/ directory since
`typed: strict` isn't going to gain us anything for some Markdown
linting config files.
- This means that now it's easier to track what needs to be done rather
than relying on checklists of files in our big Sorbet issue:
```shell
$ git grep 'typed: true # rubocop:todo Sorbet/StrictSigil' | wc -l
268
```
- And this is confirmed working for new files:
```shell
$ git status
On branch use-rubocop-for-sorbet-strict-sigils
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
Library/Homebrew/bad.rb
Library/Homebrew/good.rb
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
$ brew style
Offenses:
bad.rb:1:1: C: Sorbet/StrictSigil: Sorbet sigil should be at least strict got true.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1340 files inspected, 1 offense detected
```
- We discovered that the following syntax in the formula `sqlsmith`
should actually be OK because the `\n` is like whitespace.
```ruby
cmd = %W[
#{bin}/sqlsmith
--threads=4
--timeout=10
]
shell_output(cmd)
```
- I got bored doing them manually.
- Also now more people can help with letters of the alphabet using `brew style --only=FormulaAuditStrict/Text --fix homebrew/core`.
- This cop checks for the use of `FileUtils.rm_rf` and suggests using
`FileUtils.rm_r` because we should know if we couldn't delete a
thing for some reason, not just force it.
