Before this change, `brew bottle` would add the `:arm64_linux` bottle
lines last. This would make `brew style` complain because it wants the
`arm64_*` bottles listed first.
Let's fix this by retaining the existing style as closely as possible:
- macOS bottles are listed first
- for each OS, arm64 bottles are listed first (just as we do on macOS)
In particular, `brew bottle` will now insert `:arm64_linux` bottle lines
just above the `:x86_64_linux` bottle lines (but still below the macOS
bottle lines).
x86_64 may continue to be a more popular platform on Linux for quite
some time. However, users looking for those bottles can continue to look
in the same place as before this change (i.e., the last line of the
bottle block). Taking this together with the consistency on macOS
mentioned above, I think this is the right way forward here.
For concreteness, here are some examples of bottle blocks before and after
this change.
Before this change, immediately after `brew bottle`:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
end
Before this change, after doing `brew style --fix`:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
end
After this change:
bottle do
sha256 arm64_sequoia: "1a57e04052f4bae4172d546a7927c645fc29d2ef5fafbec19d08ee1dddc542fb"
sha256 arm64_sonoma: "a58cf9af5d04d3d5709b5337f3793586087a79e178da51d1f3978c0c13b8cf34"
sha256 ventura: "6d8b90b2cbb31dcb78394c6540f5454cd57232fc309921173814f880e63718f0"
sha256 arm64_linux: "457d3e9bd0c287483e27f29a488a18c90e1f55be076fc49b07942ef396c419be"
sha256 x86_64_linux: "cd5faac2834ba79e39429b9aac99e4f69d6e6023cbb1cbcd0b62e94cfc69bb2a"
end
This came up in the AGM and has bothered me for years: let's actually
split out `software_spec.rb` into one file per class, as is more typical
in Ruby.
This will make these classes easier to find.
