- Some of these I bumped to `typed: strict`, some of them I added
intermediary type signatures to some of the methods to make my life
easier in the (near, hopefully) future.
- Turns out that RuboCop node matchers that end in `?`
can return `nil` if they don't match anything, not `false`.
- Previously I thought that comments were fine to discourage people from
wasting their time trying to bump things that used `undef` that Sorbet
didn't support. But RuboCop is better at this since it'll complain if
the comments are unnecessary.
- Suggested in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/18018#issuecomment-2283369501.
- I've gone for a mixture of `rubocop:disable` for the files that can't
be `typed: strict` (use of undef, required before everything else, etc)
and `rubocop:todo` for everything else that should be tried to make
strictly typed. There's no functional difference between the two as
`rubocop:todo` is `rubocop:disable` with a different name.
- And I entirely disabled the cop for the docs/ directory since
`typed: strict` isn't going to gain us anything for some Markdown
linting config files.
- This means that now it's easier to track what needs to be done rather
than relying on checklists of files in our big Sorbet issue:
```shell
$ git grep 'typed: true # rubocop:todo Sorbet/StrictSigil' | wc -l
268
```
- And this is confirmed working for new files:
```shell
$ git status
On branch use-rubocop-for-sorbet-strict-sigils
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
Library/Homebrew/bad.rb
Library/Homebrew/good.rb
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
$ brew style
Offenses:
bad.rb:1:1: C: Sorbet/StrictSigil: Sorbet sigil should be at least strict got true.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1340 files inspected, 1 offense detected
```
Adding type signatures to `#audit_formula` methods in formula cops
would lead to verbose, repetitive signatures across the existing ~63
instances. This reworks `#audit_formula` to use a `T::Struct` for its
arguments, which allows us to use a one-line signature for these
methods.
After some discussion, we decided to change the DSL to get rid of
the `plist_name` and `service_name` methods which aren't meaningful
for most users.
The new DSL looks like this:
```rb
service do
name macos: "name", linux: "name"
end
```
I also updated some specs here to reflect these changes.
There was some talk about maybe deprecating `plist_name` and `service_name`
but I think that's outside of the scope of this PR so I'm leaving
them as is for now. One benefit of this is that everything here is backwards
compatible.
It now checks for two new edge cases.
1. Are the required methods defined in the block?
2. Is the `run` command defined if we're using methods other
than `service_name` or `plist_name`?
It has also been updated to only get the list of method call nodes
once instead of doing it repeatedly for each cellar path check.
The preferred method is opt_bin because that works
with the API and is more portable (works between versions).
Also removed the last example from the docs of `bin/"name"`
from the service block section
