- Remove a bunch of non-actionable/unnecessary noise in GitHub Actions
CI.
- Limit number of threads used to generate analytics API data to avoid
reproducible failures producing errors and requiring retries.
- Move to Debian Old Stable for testing non-system `glibc`.
- Remove unneeded core taps/updates.
- Improve naming of CI jobs to clarify purpose i.e. we're testing
things work on Linux, not Ubuntu specifically.
- Remove dedicated non-online/non-generic Linux `brew tests` jobs from
3 to 1.
Co-authored-by: Rylan Polster <rslpolster@gmail.com>
We've had requests for this in Homebrew/bundle a few times so let's
implement it both for there and for `brew edit`.
Tested on my machine with `cursor` and working as expected.
- hide warnings when requiring files repeatedly on a case-insensitive
filesystem and add reference to Ruby bugs
- add another case to check for command require failures
- also handle commands with `-` in them
Fixes#19125
Calls to `opoo` and `onoe` produce duplicate `Warning:` and `Error:`
messages in CI logs because we print something to stdout and print an
annotation. Annotations also produce `Error:` and `Warning:` lines in
the log.
Let's fix this by skipping printing the message if we've already printed
an annotation.
- only use annotations for `opoo` and `onoe` if
`HOMEBREW_GITHUB_ACTIONS` is set. This will make using `brew` less
noisy in GitHub Actions for third parties. See
Homebrew/discussions#5602.
- if we've already called `puts_annotation_if_env_set`, then we no
longer need to print the message to `$stderr`. The message from the
annotation already show up in the GitHub Actions log, so printing to
`$stderr` just leads to duplicate messages in the log.
While we're here, let's make sure to forward the `file:` and `line:`
kwargs of `puts_annotation_if_env_set` to the `Annotation` constructor.
- Previously I thought that comments were fine to discourage people from
wasting their time trying to bump things that used `undef` that Sorbet
didn't support. But RuboCop is better at this since it'll complain if
the comments are unnecessary.
- Suggested in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/18018#issuecomment-2283369501.
- I've gone for a mixture of `rubocop:disable` for the files that can't
be `typed: strict` (use of undef, required before everything else, etc)
and `rubocop:todo` for everything else that should be tried to make
strictly typed. There's no functional difference between the two as
`rubocop:todo` is `rubocop:disable` with a different name.
- And I entirely disabled the cop for the docs/ directory since
`typed: strict` isn't going to gain us anything for some Markdown
linting config files.
- This means that now it's easier to track what needs to be done rather
than relying on checklists of files in our big Sorbet issue:
```shell
$ git grep 'typed: true # rubocop:todo Sorbet/StrictSigil' | wc -l
268
```
- And this is confirmed working for new files:
```shell
$ git status
On branch use-rubocop-for-sorbet-strict-sigils
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
Library/Homebrew/bad.rb
Library/Homebrew/good.rb
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
$ brew style
Offenses:
bad.rb:1:1: C: Sorbet/StrictSigil: Sorbet sigil should be at least strict got true.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1340 files inspected, 1 offense detected
```
I'm declaring bankruptcy on this entire approach:
1. We can attempt to match on versions, but this will fail
when the version of `gh` installed is built from `HEAD`
or similar.
2. We can match on dates instead (since `gh --version` also includes
the date), but this is even more brittle + implies a support
contract we don't actually have (we don't actually want
to say we support random dated builds between public releases
of `gh`).
This moves us back to a simpler approach: if `gh` is present,
we use it. If `gh` is not present, we attempt to install it
with `ensure_executable!`. If the user's `gh` is present but too old,
it'll fail during attestation verification with a reasonable error,
which IMO is fine for now since this is all still in beta.
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
This improves the load time of most brew commands. For an example of
one of the simplest commands this speeds up:
Without Bootsnap:
```
$ hyperfine 'git checkout master; brew help' 'git checkout optimise_requires; brew help'
Benchmark 1: git checkout master; brew help
Time (mean ± σ): 525.0 ms ± 35.8 ms [User: 229.9 ms, System: 113.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 465.3 ms … 576.6 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: git checkout optimise_requires; brew help
Time (mean ± σ): 383.3 ms ± 25.1 ms [User: 133.0 ms, System: 72.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 353.0 ms … 443.6 ms 10 runs
Summary
git checkout optimise_requires; brew help ran
1.37 ± 0.13 times faster than git checkout master; brew help
```
With Bootsnap:
```
$ hyperfine 'git checkout master; brew help' 'git checkout optimise_requires; brew help'
Benchmark 1: git checkout master; brew help
Time (mean ± σ): 386.0 ms ± 30.9 ms [User: 130.2 ms, System: 93.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 359.5 ms … 469.3 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: git checkout optimise_requires; brew help
Time (mean ± σ): 330.2 ms ± 32.4 ms [User: 93.4 ms, System: 73.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 302.9 ms … 413.9 ms 10 runs
Summary
git checkout optimise_requires; brew help ran
1.17 ± 0.15 times faster than git checkout master; brew help
```
This will mean e.g. `opoo` etc. will output to stdout and not end up
being in the stdout of `brew deps` etc.
While we're here, remove a duplicate annotation output I noticed in
`extend/kernel.rb`.
Inspired by conversation in:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-test-bot/issues/1082
Add these and correctly pass through a string to
`GitHub::Actions.puts_annotation_if_env_set`.
Also, fix some call sites to not rely on the `void` return.
We already do this for deprecations but these may make warnings
and errors from Homebrew easier to spot in GitHub Actions logs.
While we're here, cleanup other cases that should have used
`GitHub::Actions::Annotation` but didn't and provide some helpers and
tweaks there necessary for our use case here.
This should make these messages, particular warnings, more obvious to
GitHub Actions users.
There's an argument perhaps we should do this more broadly for all
warning/error messages but: this feels like a good start.
