- move some things out of `extend` that don't really fit there e.g.
`Module`s that are included but not doing any
overriding/monkeypatching
- move some code into `extend/os` to fix all remaining
`rubocop:todo Homebrew/MoveToExtendOS`s
- remove some unneeded `bundle` skipper code that doesn't really make
sense given our current bottling strategy
- extract some `Pathname` extensions to `extend/pathname` for separate
files
- move a `ENV` `Kernel` extension into `kernel.rb`
- `odeprecate` a seemingly unused backwards compatibility method
- move `readline_nonblock` from a monkeypatch to a
`ReadlineNonblock.read` method as its only used in one place
- fix up a link in documentation
Formulae, casks, and resources have a `#livecheckable?` method that
indicates whether they contain a `livecheck` block. This is intended
to be read as "has a livecheckable?", not "is livecheckable?" (as
livecheck can find versions for some packages/resources without a
`livecheck` block). Unfortunately, correct understanding of this
method's behavior [outside of documentation] relies on historical
knowledge that few people possess, so this is often confusing to
anyone who hasn't been working on livecheck since 2020.
In the olden days, a "livecheckable" was a Ruby file containing a
`livecheck` block (originally a hash) with a filename that
corresponded to a related formula. The `livecheck` blocks in
livecheckable files were integrated into their respective formulae in
August 2020, so [first-party] livecheckables ceased to exist at that
time. From that point forward, we simply referred to these as
`livecheck` blocks.
With that in mind, this clarifies the situation by replacing
"livecheckable" language. This includes renaming `#livecheckable?` to
`#livecheck_defined?`, replacing usage of "livecheckable" as a noun
with "`livecheck` block", replacing "livecheckable" as a boolean with
"livecheck_defined", and replacing incorrect usage of "livecheckable"
as an adjective with "checkable".
- Previously I thought that comments were fine to discourage people from
wasting their time trying to bump things that used `undef` that Sorbet
didn't support. But RuboCop is better at this since it'll complain if
the comments are unnecessary.
- Suggested in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/18018#issuecomment-2283369501.
- I've gone for a mixture of `rubocop:disable` for the files that can't
be `typed: strict` (use of undef, required before everything else, etc)
and `rubocop:todo` for everything else that should be tried to make
strictly typed. There's no functional difference between the two as
`rubocop:todo` is `rubocop:disable` with a different name.
- And I entirely disabled the cop for the docs/ directory since
`typed: strict` isn't going to gain us anything for some Markdown
linting config files.
- This means that now it's easier to track what needs to be done rather
than relying on checklists of files in our big Sorbet issue:
```shell
$ git grep 'typed: true # rubocop:todo Sorbet/StrictSigil' | wc -l
268
```
- And this is confirmed working for new files:
```shell
$ git status
On branch use-rubocop-for-sorbet-strict-sigils
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
Library/Homebrew/bad.rb
Library/Homebrew/good.rb
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
$ brew style
Offenses:
bad.rb:1:1: C: Sorbet/StrictSigil: Sorbet sigil should be at least strict got true.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1340 files inspected, 1 offense detected
```
This fits the use-case I've heard multiple times where people want to
rely exclusively on their artifact provider.
Co-authored-by: Carlo Cabrera <30379873+carlocab@users.noreply.github.com>
We have no commands with Sorbet disabled and have had Sorbet enabled
for developers for a decent amount of time. As a result, we can enable
it for everyone who has run a developer command.
This also allows a bunch of `raise TypeError`s to be removed in favour
of relying on Sorbet here instead.
- I originally thought this was short for "function", but upon closer
inspection all its usages are to do with filenames. So, use "filename",
it's clearer.
`#stage` takes an optional `target` argument, which specifies the
location in which to unpack the `resource`.
Passing relative paths to `#stage`, as in
resource("foo").stage "bar"
does not work, because this calls `Pathname("bar").install` inside the
temporary directory that the contents of the resource are unpacked to.
This means that passing a relative path to `#stage` has the unintended
effect of moving files around inside a temporary directory the formula
has no access to.
Let's fix that by keeping track of the original working directory before
`#stage` was called and prepending this to `target` whenever `target` is
a relative path.
