Options such as --userimg=<path> should be parsed as an option with an
equals in its name ("userimg=") and without the path argument in
Option.name
ClosesHomebrew/homebrew#34219.
Signed-off-by: Jack Nagel <jacknagel@gmail.com>
The implementation of #eql? and #hash should ensure that if a.eql?(b),
then a.hash == b.hash, but #eql? itself should not *depend* on #hash.
For example, given
class Thingy
def eql?
instance_of?(other.class) && hash == other.hash
end
def hash
[name, *tags].hash
end
end
if #hash produces a collision for different values of [name, *tags], two
Thingy objects will appear to be eql?, even though this is not the case.
Instead, #eql? should depend on the equality of name and tags directly.
The array of options that is passed to the spawned build process is a
combination of the current ARGV, options passed in by a dependent
formula, and an existing install receipt. The objects that are
interacting here each expect the resulting collection to have certain
properties, and the expectations are not consistent.
Clear up this confusing mess by only dealing with Options collections.
This keeps our representation of options uniform across the codebase.
We can remove BuildOptions dependency on HomebrewArgvExtension, which
allows us to pass any Array-like collection to Tab.create. The only
other site inside of FormulaInstaller that uses the array is the #exec
call, and there it is splatted and thus we can substitute our Options
collection there as well.
Currently we handle options in several ways, and it is hard to remember
what code needs an option string ("--foo"), what needs only the name
("foo") and what needs an Option object.
Now that Option objects can act as strings and be converted to JSON, we
can start using them instead of passing around strings between Formula
objects, Tab objects, and ARGV-style arrays.
The Options class is a special collection that can be queried for the
inclusion of options in any form: '--foo', 'foo', or Option.new("foo").
